KIDS eff kids act age checks
page 1 / 3
EFF — The KIDS Act Would Require Age Checks To Get Online
retrieved 2026-06-28
archived for offline mesh reading
------------------------------------------------------------
Skip to main content
- About
- Contact
- Press
- People
- Opportunities
- Issues
- Free Speech
- Privacy
- Creativity and Innovation
- Transparency
- International
- Security
- Artifical Intelligence
- Our Work
- Deeplinks Blog
- Press Releases
- Events
- Legal Cases
- Whitepapers
- Podcast
- Annual Reports
- Take Action
- Action Center
- Volunteer
- Follow EFF
- Tools
- Privacy Badger
- Surveillance Self-Defense
- Certbot
- Atlas of Surveillance
- Cover Your Tracks
- Street Level Surveillance
- apkeep
- Shop
- Donate
- Donate to EFF
- Shop
- Giving Societies
- Sponsorships
- Other Ways to Give
- Membership FAQ
Email updates on news, actions,
and events in your area.
Join EFF Lists
- Copyright (CC BY)
- Trademark
- Privacy Policy
- Thanks
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Donate
If you use technology, this fight is yours.Donate today
EFFecting Change: If You Own It, Why Can't You Fix It? on July 23
Electronic Frontier Foundation
- About
- Contact
- Press
- People
- Opportunities
- Issues
- Free Speech
- Privacy
- Creativity and Innovation
- Transparency
- International
- Security
- Artifical Intelligence
- Our Work
- Deeplinks Blog
- Press Releases
- Events
- Legal Cases
- Whitepapers
- Podcast
- Annual Reports
- Take Action
- Action Center
- Volunteer
- Follow EFF
- Tools
- Privacy Badger
- Surveillance Self-Defense
- Certbot
- Atlas of Surveillance
- Cover Your Tracks
- Street Level Surveillance
- apkeep
- Shop
- Donate
- Donate to EFF
- Shop
- Giving Societies
- Sponsorships
- Other Ways to Give
- Membership FAQ
The KIDS Act Would Require Age Checks To Get Online
DEEPLINKS BLOG
By Joe Mullin
June 24, 2026
The KIDS Act Would Require Age Checks To Get Online
Share It
Share on Mastodon
Share on Bluesky
Share on Facebook
Copy link
Within the next week, Congress is preparing to vote on the KIDS Act, a sprawling package of legislation that seeks to control Americans’ web browsing and private messaging. The package includes a revised version of the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, combined with a collection of other internet bills, study bills, reporting requirements, and new regulations. Instead of debating any of these proposals on their merits, lawmakers are attempting to move them all at once under an ultra-expedited process.
The package of cobbled-together bills is a mess, with different age-gating schemes for different services, using different standards. It’s a lot of complexity, and a lot of legal risk. Faced with that, many companies will conclude that the safest option is restrictive age-checking practices across their entire platforms.
Buried inside the KIDS Act are provisions that will push online services to verify all users’ ages, require government-directed moderation policies for online speech, and even create new rules about private and encrypted communications. While supporters continue to claim this bill protects minors online, its requirements come at the expense of privacy, free expression, and the ability of people of all ages to use the internet without revealing sensitive data.
Take action
Tell Congress to reject this age-gating bill
The KIDS Act Pressures Platforms to Check Everyone's Age
Supporters of KOSA have said the bill doesn’t require age verification. And technically, the KOSA section of the bill does say that KOSA shouldn’t be read to require age verification.
But if you read the rest of the bill, that disclaimer starts to look hollow.
Throughout the KOSA section of the legislation, special protections, controls, messaging settings, and parental tools are required whenever a website or app “knows or should have known” a user is a child (defined in the bill as anyone under 13) or a teen (defined as anyone between 13 and 16 years old).
The problem is a website operator doesn’t need actual knowledge that a user is a minor to get in legal trouble. It applies when a platform “knows or should have known” a user’s age—a low, negligence-style standard of knowledge. If an online service gets it wrong, it’s going to be up to courts and regulators to decide, after the fact, if an online service “should” have known a user was 16.
To try to avoid liability, services will have to determine which users are teenagers and which are not. Most won’t be able to simply trust their users. They’ll have to collect more information about age, before any lawsuit or government action arises. Some companies may respond by requesting driver's licenses or passports. Others will rely on age-estimation systems that attempt to guess users' ages by looking at existing activity or doing facial scans. Existing estimation systems make mistakes when estimating children’s ages correctly, which is a big problem when that is the population KOSA is trying to protect. And the systems fail more frequently for people of color, people with disabilities, and trans and nonbinary people.